Tanveer Vais Khan v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed because trial commenced and prosecution evidence already recorded; trial expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 288-19.doc
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2019
Tanveer Vais Khan .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr. Milan Desai i/b. Mr. T. R. Patel, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Prakash Vasant Bale, PI, Aarey Police Station, Mumbai present
. Learned APP has tendered an Affidavit of Mr. Prakash
Vasant Bale , Police Inspector attached to the Aarey Police Station, Mumbai. The same is taken on record and a copy thereof is served on the learned counsel for the Applicant.
as, the Complainant's evidence is over. He submitted that the prosecution intends to examine about 3 – 4 witnesses.
1 of 2
BA 288-19.doc
necessary to consider this Application at this stage. Accordingly, the Application is disposed of. However, since the trial of the Applicant has commenced, the trial is expedited.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
2 of 2
Tanveer Vais Khan
The State of Maharashtra
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court