The applicant withdrew the anticipatory bail application after the court indicated it was not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of anticipatory bail application allowed; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 913.79.19 aba.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2019
Kisan Ramchandra Kale
.....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
.....Respondent
Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil i/b Mr. Prashant S. Hagare advocate for the applicant
Mr. A. A. Palkar APP for the State
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 11, 2019.
P.C.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, when this
Court is not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail, the learned counsel for
the applicant on instructions makes a motion to withdraw the
application. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Kisan Ramchandra Kale
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
