High Court of Bombay held that bail application is not maintainable as criminal trial has commenced. Trial court directed to expedite trial within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 121-19.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2019
Vishal Shiva Hosmani .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr. Aditya Bapat, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs. P. P. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Pramod Raskar, PSI, Pantnagar Police Station, Mumbai present
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 24.06.2019
P.C.
. At the outset, learned APP on the instructions of the
investigating officer, Mr. Raskar, PSI, who is present in Court
submits that the trial has commenced and that five witnesses have been examined till date. She submits that the prosecution intends
to examine four more witnesses.
2. Considering the fact that the trial has commenced, it is
not necessary to consider this Application for bail at this stage.
Since the trial has commenced and the Applicant is in custody for
1 of 2
BA 121-19.doc
the last three years, the trial of the Applicant is expedited. The learned Sessions Judge to conclude the case as expeditiously as possible and in any event within four months from the date of receipt of this order.
All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this
order.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
2 of 2
Vishal Shiva Hosmani
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
