Disposed
Vivek Kantichand Dhadha v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPP/273/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPP 273-19.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 273 OF 2019
( For Intervention ) IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 404 OF 2019
Vivek Kantichand Dhadha .Intervention
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Sudhirr K. Singh & ors.
.Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr. Kunal Changrani i/b. Mr. Manoj S. Mhambrey, Advocate, for the Applicant
Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Karma Vivan, Advocate, for the Intervenor
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 24.06.2019
P.C.
. Learned counsel for the Applicant states that he has no
objection, if the Intervention Application is allowed and the
Complainant is impleaded as party Respondent No. 2. Accordingly, the Intervention Application is allowed. Learned
counsel for the Applicant is granted leave to implead the
1 of 2
APPP 273-19.doc
Complainant as party Respondent No. 2. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Mr. Karma Vivan, Advocate waives notice on behalf of the Intervenor.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
2 of 2
Vivek Kantichand Dhadha
Sudhirr K. Singh & ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court