This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ba.34.19.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2019
Subhash Sitaram Giri ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Ashok Mundargi, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Ashok Kumar S. Dubey and Ms. Ujwal R. Agandsurve for the Applicant
Mr. Pradeep Gharat, Spl. P.P with Ms. Veera Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
API Mr. Sharad Zihe, Unit XI from DCB CID, Mumbai, is present
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. FRIDAY, 21 st JUNE 2019
P.C. :
1 Learned A.P.P, on instructions, states that the trial has
commenced and 168 witnesses have been examined till date. He
further states that 25-30 more witnesses are to be examined. He
submits that the prosecution has no objection, if the trial is expedited.
2 In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant
does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the same.
1/2
SQ Pathan
ba.34.19.19.doc
are examined and only 25 to 30 witnesses are yet to be examined, it would be appropriate to direct the learned Judge to decide the case as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within 12 months from the date of receipt of this order. Parties to cooperate in the conduct of the trial.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
SQ Pathan
Subhash Sitaram Giri
The State of Maharashtra
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
