Court extended time to furnish surety to the applicant/accused who was unable to comply due to his sick one-year-old daughter's health issues.
Time to furnish surety extended to 26th April 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
506.APPR239_2019.doc
Vidya Amin.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 239 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 97 OF 2019
Pradeep Vikram Nikam … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Mohsin Pathan i/b. Mr. Rahul Arote, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: 22nd April, 2019
P.C. :
Upon urgent mentioning, taken on Production Board.
applicant/accused to furnish surety by order dated 22nd February, 2019. The cash bail of Rs.15,000/- was accepted and time to furnish surety was granted upto 22nd March, 2019.
the one year old daughter of applicant/accused was sick during that period and therefore, he could not furnish surety and also
could not approach the Court well in time.
1 of 2
506.APPR239_2019.doc
accordingly.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 of 2
Pradeep Vikram Nikam
The State of Maharashtra
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
