This order condones a delay of 269 days in filing a review petition allowing the civil application and ordering registration of the review petition. The review petition is listed for future hearing despite opposition by respondents.
Civ. Application allowed and disposed of; Review Petition registered and listed for 12th July, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
919-cao-135-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 135 OF 2019 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 8651 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7112 OF 2017 WITH REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 8651 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7112 OF 2017
Ulhas Harishchandra Dhargalkar …Applicant
Versus
Padmakar Vasant Desai & Anr. …Respondents
-----
Mr.Sudhir C.Halli for the Applicant. Ms.Duhita Desai for the Respondents.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 18 APRIL 2019
P.C.:
a senior citizen. He further submits that the applicant could not seek legal opinion in time and hence, there is a delay of 269 days.
1/2
Trupti
919-cao-135-2019.doc
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2/2
Trupti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay of 269 days in filing a review petition is warranted given the applicant being a senior citizen and inability to seek legal opinion in time.
Ulhas Harishchandra Dhargalkar
Padmakar Vasant Desai & Anr.
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
