Single judge rejected criminal application challenging cancelltion of bail after invocation of Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. Held cancellation correct.
Criminal application rejected; bail cancelled; applicants to apply for fresh bail before Special Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.APL474.doc
Vidya Amin.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 474 OF 2019
Pintya alias Prakash Salve & Ors. … Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Satyam H. Nimbalkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. Veera Shinde, APP for the respondent/State. Mr. G.S. Madgulkar, ACP, Dehu Road present.
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: 22nd April, 2019
P.C. :
Upon mentioning, taken on production board.
the accused, the investigating agency has applied MCOC Act after seeking necessary prior approval and hence, as the accused are
now prosecuted for the offence punishable under MCOC Act, they
1 of 2
3.APL474.doc
are required to be taken in custody.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail granted to accused must be cancelled upon invocation of the MCOC Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pintya alias Prakash Salve & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
