State of Maharashtra filed Criminal Application No. 654 of 2017 challenging an order. The Bombay High Court held there was sufficient cause to condone a delay of 38 days and made the rule absolute.
Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1 20-appln654.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 654 OF 2017
The State of Maharashtra
…..Applicant
Vs.
Tanaji Shripati Jadhav & Anr.
….Respondents.
Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Applicant. Mr. Chetan Gajanan Patil for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 18th FEBRUARY, 2019.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned APP for the Applicant. The learned
counsel appearing for the Respondents opposes the prayer.
2 There is a sufficient cause to condone the delay of 38 days.
Hence, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
1/1
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there is sufficient cause to condone the delay of 38 days.
Whether the rule made absolute under prayer clause (b) should be upheld.
Whether this application deserves hearing on merits.
The State of Maharashtra
Tanaji Shripati Jadhav & Anr.
A. S. OKA
A. S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
