Dismissed
Sayyad Nisar Sharifmiyan v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/654/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crwp654.doc
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.654 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioner
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
SARANG V.KOTWAL,JJ.
DATE :FEBRUARY 15, 2019
P.C.:
1The learned APP has submitted a
report which is taken on record and
marked `X' for identification. The
report records that the petitioner has
beenreleasedfromjailafter
undergoing sentence. Hence, nothing
survives in the petition and the same
is disposed of.
(SARANG V.KOTWAL,J) (A.S.OKA,J.)
Petitioner
State
SARANG V KOTWAL
A S OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court