Allowed
Sahadev Narayan Khandagale v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/136/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
appa136.doc
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.136 OF 2019 IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1625 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.540 OF 2018
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Rahul Thakur for the Applicant
Ms P.P.Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
SARANG V.KOTWAL,JJ.
DATE :FEBRUARY 15, 2019
P.C.:
1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant. A case for restoration is
made out. Accordingly, application is
allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a)
and(c). Place the restored criminal
application for hearing on 7th March
2019.
(SARANG V.KOTWAL,J) (A.S.OKA,J.)
Mr.Rahul Thakur
State
A.S.OKA
SARANG V.KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court