Allowed
Archana Anant Mahale v. Mahendrakumar Waman Pandit and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/359/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.appln359.17.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2017
Archana Anant Mahale. ..Applicant. V/s. Mahendrakumar Waman Pandit & ors. ..Respondents.
Mr. S.V. Marwadi I/b. Mr. Nadar Soloman John, advocate for applicant. None for respondents.
Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J.
DATE : APRIL 22, 2019.
P. C. :
1 None present for the respondent. The respondent has filed an affidavit in reply. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing application for leave to appeal. The delay is of 20 days. For the reasons assigned in paragraph-III, the delay of 20 days deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of accordingly.
[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.]
Talwalkar
Archana Anant Mahale
Mahendrakumar Waman Pandit
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court