Single judge allowed condonation of one year and six days delay in filing a criminal application and disposed of the matter.
Condonation of delay of one year and six days; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
Dusane
25 appa 268.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.268 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO. 156 OF 2017
Shri. Yashwant Narayan Manjrekar .... Applicant Vs.
Shri. Nilkanth Shelke & Ors. .... Respondents
Mr. Sanskar Marathe for the Applicant.
Ms. Ankeeta Appanna i/by KRY Legal for Respondent no.12. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for State.
Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J. Date : 16th April 2019
P.C.:
1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Office note
shows that notice served upon respondent nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 12,
14 and 15. Notice served upon respondent nos. 6, 9, 10, 13 returned un-served. Court notice of respondent nos. 3 and 7 awaited. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of respondent no.12.
Dusane 2/2 25 appa 268.2017.doc
2 None appears for the respondents although served.
Hence, for the reasons assigned in paragraph nos. 3, 4 and 5, the delay of 1 year and 6 days deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. Hence, the delay is condoned and the application stands disposed of.
( Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav , J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of one year and six days in filing the criminal application deserves condonation in the interest of justice.
Shri. Yashwant Narayan Manjrekar
Shri. Nilkanth Shelke & Ors.
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
