Court disposed of an application to withdraw Vakalatnama as not pressed by the applicant's counsel. No substantive legal proposition articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa53.19 2
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.53/2019 IN CRIMIINAL APPEAL NO.239/2017 Guddu Santosh Chaitu Pungati
..vs..
State of Mah., thr. PSO Chamorshi, Tahsil Charmorshi, District Gadchiroli
....................................................................................................................................................................................... O ffice N otes, O ffice M em oranda of C oram , appearances, C ourt orders or direction s C ourt's or Judge's O rder and R egistrar's orders
Shri S.K.Bhandarkar, Counsel for the applicant. Mrs.S.V.Kolhe, Addl.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 15, 201 9 .
withdraw the Vakalatnama.
JU D G E
!! BR W !!
...../-
Guddu Santosh Chaitu Pungati
State of Mah.
V.M.Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
