Court disposed of the applicant's application for permission to withdraw Vakalatnama as the matter was not pressed by his counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa52.19 1
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.52/2019 IN
CRIMIINAL APPEAL NO.108/2018 Maroti s/o Shankar Barsagade
..vs..
State of Mah., thr. PSO Chamorshi, Tahsil Charmorshi, District Gadchiroli
....................................................................................................................................................................................... O ffice N otes, O ffice M em oranda of C oram , appearances, C ourt orders or direction s C ourt's or Judge's O rder and R egistrar's orders
Shri S.K.Bhandarkar, Counsel for the applicant. Mrs.S.V.Kolhe, Addl.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 15, 201 9 .
withdraw the Vakalatnama.
JU D G E
!! BR W !!
...../-
Maroti s/o Shankar Barsagade
State of Mah.
V.M.DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
