Criminal applications were dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicants and their counsel failed to appear on the date of hearing. No substantive legal principle was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nalawade
18-apl-199-19 & ors..doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICAITON NO.199 OF 2019
Mrs. Rabia Abdulla Dalwal
...Applicant
Vs.
Dewas Metal Section Pvt. Ltd. & ors.
...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICAITON NO.200 OF 2019 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICAITON NO.201 OF 2019 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICAITON NO.202 OF 2019
-----
None for the Applicant in all the Applications.
Mr. Mahesh Rawool i/by Avinash Avhad for Respondent No.1 in Application Nos. 199/2019 and 200 of 2019.
Mr. H.J.Dedia, APP for State in all the applications.
CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 7TH OCTOBER, 2019
PC :
applicants and therefore, the matters are listed today under the caption
of “Dismissal”. The applicants and their counsel are absent. The
Page-1/2
Nalawade 18-apl-199-19 & ors..doc learned counsel representing the respondent No.1 has put in his appearance. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the applications and that is why they are absent even today.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Page-2/2
Rabia Abdulla Dalwal
Dewas Metal Section Pvt. Ltd.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
