Allowed

Kaluram Shahaji Sabale and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC5 Apr 2019ABA/775/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail granted to applicants charged with offences under Sections 143, 147, 149, 427, 395 IPC. Ordered release on bail with conditions requiring appearance before Sessions Court within three weeks for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on PR Bond of Rs. 10,000 each with one surety; ordered to appear before Sessions Court within three weeks to seek regular bail.

Kaluram Shahaji Sabale and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Nalawade

¶2

2-aba-775-19.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 775 OF 2019

¶5

Kaluram Shahaji Sabale and ors ….Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent.

¶6

Mr.Ganersh Bhujbal for Applicant. Mr. S.H.Yadavl,APP. for the State. Mr.J.D.Karbhal (P.N.) Alandi Deevaji Police Station present.

¶7

CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 05^th April, 2019

¶8

PC :

¶9

Issue notice. Learned APP waives service for respondent-State. Some

¶10

police constable is present as deputed by Investigating O8cer along with copy of charge-sheet.

¶11

Learned counsel for applicants submitted that applicants apprehend their arrest in this crime as their names are mentioned in the report which is against 50 other unknown persons alleging that on 15^th July 2008, said persons caused damage to complainant's establishment where he used to run Lok Natya training institute. It is contended that applicants are shown as absconding in charge-sheet.

Page1/3

Nalawade

2-aba-775-19.doc

Perusal of report would reveal that same is lodged on the basis of information received by complainant Tukaram Mane from watchmen namely Sabale and Sawant. No full names of watchmens are mentioned in report. Perusal of charge-sheet does not reveal any witnesses by name Sawant though there are names of two witnesses whose surname are Sabale, their statement are not forming part of charge-sheet. In that view of matter, part of content of FIR prima facie appears to be inadmissible being hearsay, in absence of statement of Sabale or Sawant, from whom complaint claims to have knowledge of incident. Even otherwise there are vague allegation in report involving about 50 unknown men and women who had caused damage to complainant's property where he used to run Lok Natya training institute and in the course of same transaction, are alleged to have stolen gold ornaments, cash and mobile phone, totally valued at Rs.1,10,000/-, learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that no recovery of any articles is e?ected during the course of investigation.

¶17

Having considered involvement of applicant as aforesaid, following order is passed :-

Page2/3

Nalawade

2-aba-775-19.doc

ORDER

(i) In the event of arrest of applicants in C.R. No.9 of 2008 registered with Alandi-Devachi Police Station, Pimpri Chichwad, Pune for the o?ences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 149, 427, 395 of IPC, they shall be released on bail on their executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/each with one surety each in the like amount;

¶23

(ii) Since applicants are shown absconding in charge-sheet Cled in C.R. No.9 of 2008 registered with Alandi-Devachi Police Station, Pimpri Chichwad, Pune, they shall appear before learned Sessions Court and seek regular bail within three weeks from today;

¶24

(iii) In the event applicants adopt recourse as aforesaid, their applications shall be considered within reasonable period;

¶25

(iv) Application is disposed o? in above terms.

¶26

( P.N.DESHMUKH, J.)

¶27

Page3/3

Kaluram Shahaji Sabale and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaluram Shahaji Sabale and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aniket Arvind Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Suraj Chandrakant Tiwale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Machindra Shankar Tingare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ashalata Ananda Gaikwad and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nilesh Rajkumar Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mauli Khandu Gunjal Vs the State of Maharashtra