Allowed

Mohd. Arif Muzammil Khan v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC29 Jul 2019ABA/596/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay granted pre-arrest anticipatory bail to the applicant in a trial regarding offences under the IPC and Indian Arms Act. The order noted the applicant was a member of an unlawful assembly with no overt acts attributed to him and gestured bail to co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest bail granted as a condition precedent to arrest, subject to a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and compliance with reporting and non-influence conditions.

Mohd. Arif Muzammil Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

aba.596.19.55.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPTORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 596 OF 2019

¶3

Mohd. Arif Muzammil Khan ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶4

Mr. S. R. Samel I/b Mr. Rajeev Sawant & Associates for the Applicant

¶5

Mr. V. V. Gangurde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State

¶6

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. MONDAY, 29th JULY 2019

¶7

P.C.

¶8

1 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶9

2 By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. 511 of 2018 registered with the Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 324, 323, 143, 144, 145, 147, 148, 149, 427, 452, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 4, 25 of the Indian Arms Act.

¶10

3 Learned counsel for the applicant submits that identically placed co-accused have been granted pre-arrest bail by this Court

1/3

SQ Pathan

aba.596.19.55.doc

(Coram : A. S. Gadkari, J.) vide order dated 15^th April 2019 passed in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 881 of 2019.

¶15

4 Perused the papers. Admittedly, the applicant's name is not disclosed in the FIR. The applicant's name has emerged in the supplementary statement of the complainant. Prima facie, it appears from the record that except for the fact that the applicant was present at the spot and was a member of the alleged unlawful assembly, there is no overt act attributed to the applicant. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet is filed.

¶16

5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances and having regard to the fact that identically placed co-accused have been granted prearrest bail, custodial interrogation of the applicant is not warranted. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is granted prearrest bail on the following terms and conditions :

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount;

2/3

SQ Pathan

aba.596.19.55.doc

(ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station on 6^th and 7^th August 2019 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon;

¶23

(iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to contact or influence the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case.

¶24

6 The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.

¶25

7 It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie, for the purpose of deciding this application.

¶26

8 All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶27

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

¶28

3/3

¶29

SQ Pathan

Mohd. Arif Muzammil Khan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Arif Muzammil Khan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Azaad Khan @ Shaikh and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Akshaya Alias Bokya Sanjay Jawale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Faiyaz Amanullah Khan and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pushpa Jokhuram Vishwakarma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Asif Nazim Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mahendra S/O. Kailash Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra