This is a one-line order dismissing an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel did not appear on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
aba.230.19.49.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2019
Asif Nazim Khan ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
None for the Applicant
Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. MONDAY, 29 th JULY 2019
P.C. :
1 None appeared for the applicant on 22nd July 2019,
pursuant to which, the matter was adjourned to today. Even today,
none appears for the applicant.
2 Application is accordingly dismissed for want of
prosecution.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
SQ Pathan
Asif Nazim Khan
The State of Maharashtra
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
