The Application was withdrawn as the underlying FIR had been quashed by a Division Bench of this Court, rendering the prayer infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABA 514-19.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 514 OF 2019
Mohd. Azaad Khan @ Shaikh & anr. .Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr. S. H. Singh i/b. Ms Kusum Pandey, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 26.07.2019
P.C.
. Learned counsel for the Applicants seeks leave to withdraw
the Application, as the FIR has been quashed by the Division Bench of
this Court. Accordingly, the Application is disposed of as infructuous.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Mohd. Azaad Khan @ Shaikh & anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
