Suresh Lachhmandas Keswani Vs General Manager, Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

The grievance of the petitioner is that though he had made a complaint dated 18^th September, 2015 (Exh.D) before second respondent but till date the said complaint which has been filed against the respondent No.3 Ulhasnagar Branch of Konark Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. has not been considered and decided.

¶14

1/2

¶15

WP 9069-16.doc

¶16

Having regard to the aforesaid without commenting

¶17

upon the merits of the matter and on petitioner's said complaint, we dispose of this petition by directing respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's complaint filed against respondent No.3 on its own merits in accordance with law after giving them an opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible, but in any case not later than three months from the date of appearance of the petitioner and respondent No.3 before it. The petitioner and respondent No.3 to appear before respondent No.2 on 27^th March, 2018 at 11.00 a.m..

¶18

With aforesaid directions the petition is disposed of.

¶19

( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

¶20

2/2

Suresh Lachhmandas Keswani v. General Manager, Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Lachhmandas Keswani v. General Manager, Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rekha Mohite Patil Vs the State of Mahrashtra through Goverment Pleader and 3 Ors.

Mallesh Narsappa Vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Geeta Shivmutri Naik Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Urn Terminal Lpg through Territory Manager and Anr.

Dashrath Prabhu Kadam Vs State of Maharashtra through the Commissioner of Police, and Anr.

Tushar Guru Salien Vs State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors. and Bharat Momle and Anr. (Contemnors)

Crop Care Federation of India Vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.