The High Court of Bombay disposed of two writ petitions challenging a communication regarding co-marketing. The Court observed that the State was not prohibiting co-marketing but requiring compliance with the Insecticides Act and Rules, leaving the efficient management of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-wpl-621-2018.doc911
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.621 OF 2018
Crop Care Federation of India
...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.624 OF 2018
United Phosphorus Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
...Petitioners
vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Darius J. Khambata, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Saket More, Mr. Ankit Virmani, Mr. Subit Chakrabarti and Ms. Neha Joshi i/b. Vidhi Partners, for the Petitioner in WPL. No. 621 of 2018.
Mr. Navroz Seervai, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Saket More, Mr. Ankit Virmani, Mr. Subit Chakrabarti and Ms. Neha Joshi i/b. Vidhi Partners, for the Petitioner in WPL. No. 624 of 2018. Mr. G.W. Mattos, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Amrendra Mishra a/w. Mr. Anand Singh, for Respondent No. 3. Mr. S.M. Katkar, Chief Quality Control Officer, Agriculture Commissionarate, Pune present.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 07, 2018
P.C.:
. By filing this Petition, the Petitioners have challenged
the communication dated 12th December, 2017 issued by the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
910-wpl-621-2018.doc911
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
Crop Care Federation of India
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
