The High Court of Bombay disposed of Contempt Petition No. 1 of 2017 as rendered infructuous based on instructions to counsel.
The Contempt Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1 OF 2017
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 44 OF 2016
Mr. Tushar Guru Salien ...Contempt Petitioner (Org. Petitioner) Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents (Org. Respondents) And Mr. Bharat Momle & anr. ...Contemnors
Mr. S.S. Joshi i/b B.C. Jogal for the petitioner. Ms. Trupti Puranik for the respondents – MCGM.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 7th MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner on instructions
submits that this Contempt Petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is rendered infructuous and accordingly disposed of.
Tushar Guru Salien
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
