R. K. Parikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn under convention no. 13.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 40.887.18 wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 887 OF 2018
R. K. Parikh
.....Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and another
....Respondents
Mr. Harshwardhana Khambataa i/b Bhave & Co. for the petitioner. Mrs. S. S. Kaushik APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : MARCH 5, 2018.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw
the petition.
steps as are permissible and available.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
ism
R. K. Parikh
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court