Disposed

Brijesh Rameshchandra Chaurasiya v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Mar 2018APL/126/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment stays a non-bailable warrant against the applicant for two weeks while imposing conditions to deposit costs and furnish surety within specified timelines, accepting the applicant's undertaking to attend the trial court regularly.

What did the court decide?

Non-bailable warrant stayed for two weeks; costs of ₹10,000 deposited; surety to be furnished within six weeks on same bail conditions.

Brijesh Rameshchandra Chaurasiya Vs the State… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

APL 126 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 126 OF 2018

¶4

Brijesh Rameshchandra Chaurasiya ...Applicant

¶5

Vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra

¶7

...Respondent

¶8

¶9

Mr. R.G. Shatalwar for Applicant Mr. Y.Y. Dabke-APP for the State

¶10

¶11

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE: MARCH 1, 2018

¶12

P.C.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant-Accused and the learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

Non-bailable warrant was issued against the Applicant on the ground that

¶16

the Applicant was consistently absent before the Appeal Court and has not furnished the surety though he was enjoying the bail order.

¶17

3, The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that Applicant undertakes

¶18

to regularly attend the Trial Court and shall also furnish the surety within six weeks, the non- bailable warrant issued against the Applicant may be quashed.

¶19

In the interest of justice and having taken note of the undertaking given

1/2

V.A. Tikam

APL 126 of 2018

Applicant that he shall regularly attend the Trial Court, the following order is passed:

¶24

(i) Within three weeks from today, the Applicant shall deposit the costs of Rs.10,000/- before the Learned Trial Court;

¶25

(ii) Within two weeks from today, the Applicant shall furnish surety within six weeks to the satisfaction of Trial Court on the same conditions as has been imposed by the Trial Court at the time of release the Applicant on bail. If the surety to the satisfaction of the Trial Court is not furnished, the order of issuance of warrant shall held in operation;

¶26

(iii) The assurance/ undertaking given by the Applicant that the Applicant shall regularly attend the Trial Court is accepted/ recorded. The nonbailable warrant as ordered by the Learned Trial Court shall be stayed for a period of two weeks.

¶27

The criminal application stands disposed of in the above view.

¶28

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

¶29

2/2

¶30

V.A. Tikam

Brijesh Rameshchandra Chaurasiya v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijesh Rameshchandra Chaurasiya v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhinder Jaswant Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sayyedalli Mohammedali Siddqui Vs the State of Maharashtra

Janu Bhika Bangar Vs Narayan Bhiwa Vyapari and Anr.

Anil Mahadeo Howale Vs Union of India and Anr.

Nagraj Sudam Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Nikhil Kamalkar Wadhavkar Vs Union of India and Ors.