High Court modified bail conditions in a criminal application, restricting the applicant from entering the Kashimira Police Station limits except for court proceedings due to co-residence with the complainant and pending charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 22.6.18 apl
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2018
Vijay Dinesh Mishra .....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent
Mr. Atul Damle senior advocate i/b Mr. Rupesh Lanjekar for the applicant.
Mr. Viresh Purwant a/w Mr. Rushikesh Kalel for respondent no. 1. Mrs. S. S. Kaushik APP for the State. Ms. Sarojana B. Makalikar, API Kashimira Police Station.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : MARCH 5, 2018.
P.C.
After hearing the respective counsel and the learned APP, it is noticed that there are 3 complaints of which cognizance was not taken by the police authorities, still are pressed into service and relied upon for modifying the conditions of Bail, thereby debarring him from entering in the Thane district.
ism
2 22.6.18 apl
Applicant shall not enter within the limits of Kashimira Police
Station except for attending the Court proceedings.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
ism
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to modify bail conditions when applicant and complainant reside in the same building.
Vijay Dinesh Mishra
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
