Writ petition in public interest manner challenging tax order dismissed for existence of effective alternative remedy provided under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act. Court left contentions open for appellate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
884-17-WP-24=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 884 OF 2017
M/s. Jones Lang Lasalle Property Consultants (India) Pvt. Ltd.
.. Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. C.B. Thakar a/w Mr. Rahul Thakar I/b C.B. Thakar & Co. for the petitioner
Mr. V.A. Sonpal, Special Counsel a/w Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.
DATED : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P.C.
the impugned order dated 30th November, 2016 to the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeals) under the MVAT Act. In the
1 of 2
Digitally signed by Uday Uday Shivaji Jagtap Shivaji Date: 2018.09.24 18:44:41 Jagtap +0530
884-17-WP-24=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
above view, as the petitioner has availed of an efficacious alternative remedy under the Act, we see no reason to entertain this petition in our extra ordinary writ jurisdiction.
herein are left open to be urged before the appellate Authorities.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
3 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Jones Lang Lasalle Property Consultants (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
