The High Court Bench allowed a notice of motion filed by Kopran Ltd. for condonation of a 135-day delay in filing an appeal from the Tribunal, accepting the applicant's explanation.
Condonation of delay in filing the memorandum of appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
409-18-NMA-19=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 409 OF 2018 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 5 OF 2018
Kopran Ltd.
.. Applicant
In the matter between
Kopran Ltd.
.. Appellant
v/s.
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Ramnath Prabhu I/b P.K. Shetty for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Ram Ochani for the respondents
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.
DATED : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P.C.
1 of 2
409-18-NMA-19=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
it is stated that the impugned order of the Tribunal was received on 28th February, 2017 and the Officer Mr. M.S. Siddesha, looking after this issue left the applicant on 15th April, 2017. Thus, the delay. We are satisfied with the reasons indicated for condonation of delay.
not oppose the application for condonation of delay.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of 135-day delay in filing a memorandum of appeal from the Tribunal is to be allowed?
Kopran Ltd.
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal & Anr.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
