Notice of Motion dismissed as infructuous since the underlying Central Excise Appeal was withdrawn by the Revenue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
389-18-NMA-16=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 389 OF 2018 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 74 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai
.. Applicant
In the matter between
The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Lubrizol India Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr. M. Dwivedi for the applicant / orig. appellant Ms. Lalita S. Phadke for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.
DATED : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P.C.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
1 of 1
The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai
The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai
M/s. Lubrizol India Pvt. Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
