Petitioner challenged a criminal order acquitting him under the Motor Vehicles Act. Court found petition infructuous after setting aside conviction, disposed of petition.
Petition disposed of as having turned infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dusane 1 4 wp 782.2008.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.782 OF 2008
Bharat Amarchand Doshi … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. S. Sarkar I/by Mr. H.K. Prem & Sharmila S. Kaushik for the Petitioner.
Mrs. P.P. Shinde, Additional P. P. for State.
CORAM :- R. M. SAVANT & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE :- 24TH APRIL, 2018
P. C. :-
1 The learned counsel for the Petitioner tenders the copy of
the judgment and order dated 27th June, 2011 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 38th Court, Ballard Pier,
Mumbai. By the said judgment and order, the Petitioner herein has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 185 of the
Motor Vehicles Act. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in view of the said judgment and order, the above petition for the relief as sought has turned infructuous. The petition is accordingly
1 of 2
Dusane 2 4 wp 782.2008.doc disposed of as having turned infructuous. The copy of the judgment and order dated 27th June, 2011 is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.)
2 of 2
Bharat Amarchand Doshi
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Savant
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
