Petition seeking appropriate recourse was allowed to be withdrawn by the Court and dismissed, noting that any future application will be tried on merits.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 33-18.doc-4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.33 OF 2018
Aftab, Son of Nawab Hassan Shaikh. ] … Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] … Respondents
Mrs. Anjali Awasthi i/b Mr. N. S. Acharya for Petitioner. Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, Addl. P. P. for State – Respondent No.1. Mr. D. P. Singh for Respondent No.2 – UOI.
CORAM :- R. M. SAVANT & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE :- 23 APRIL, 2018
P. C. :-
the above Petition to seek appropriate recourse. The Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.)
1 of 1
URS
Aftab, Son of Nawab Hassan Shaikh.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Sarang V. Kotwal
R. M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
