Disposed
Santosh Ramashre Yadav and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/68/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-68-18(38)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 68 OF 2018
Santosh Ramashre Yadav & Anr Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors
..Petitioners
..Respondents
Mr. V. P. Rajan i/b Mr. R. M. Parmar for the Petitioners Mr. Ajay Patil APP for the Respondent State
CORAM :R. M. SAVANT, & SARANG V KOTWAL,JJ DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2018
P.C.
1 The above Writ Petition has been filed for seeking a direction that the Respondent No.3 to submit a detailed action taken report as regards FIR No.110/2016 dated 2-6-2016. We are informed by the Learned APP Mr. Patil that the child Prince is presently in the custody of his mother at Surat. Upon this the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the forcible custody of the child has been taken notwithstanding the fact that the application of the mother for custody has been rejected by the concerned courts. If that be so, it is for the Petitioners to take appropriate steps in the Competent Court in that regard. Hence there is no warrant to keep the above Petition pending, the same is accordingly disposed of.
[SARANG V. KOTWAL, J]
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
mmj
Santosh Ramashre Yadav & Anr
The State of Maharashtra & Ors
R. M. Savant
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court