Sojar Gangaram Kale v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Division Bench observed that the issue is no longer res integra based on W.P. No. 1311 of 1997. It directed respondents to release pay benefits to eligible petitioners appointed before 1972 holding SSC qualification.
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to release pay benefits to eligible petitioners within six months if found entitled.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 671 OF 2018
Smt. Sojar w/o Gangaram Kale…Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others…Respondents
Mr. B.S.Kudale, advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.S.Bora, advocate for respondent no.2
Mr. V.S.Panpatte, advocate for respondent nos. 3 and 4
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : JULY 27, 2018
O R D E R :
Heard learned counsel for the respective
parties.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners holding SSC qualification appointed prior to 1972 are entitled to the specified pay bands since 1986 and 1996.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Sojar w/o Gangaram Kale
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
S.V.Gangapurwala
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ganpatrao Eknathrao Narwade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others
Harvindersingh Basantsingh Bindra Vs Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1 Aurangabad and Another
Mangalabai Bhausaheb Pathade and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others
Sayed Rauf Sayed Yusuf Quadri and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others