The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 8537 of 2018 as withdrawn upon the petitioners' counsel seeking leave to withdraw the petition to enable prosecution of a representation with the Authority. No costs were awarded.
The Writ Petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
933-wp-8537-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
933 WRIT PETITION NO. 8537 OF 2018
MANGALABAI BHAUSAHEB PATHADE AND ANOTHER
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Mahesh R. Sonwane, Advocate for the
Petitioners.
Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 26th JULY, 2018.
PER COURT:-
1.Mr. Sonwane, learned counsel for
petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw the Writ Petition, so as to enable him to
prosecute his representation with the Authority.
2.Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of
as withdrawn. No costs.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/July-18
MANGALABAI BHAUSAHEB PATHADE AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court