The court allowed a civil application for amendment filed by the petitioner in a writ petition concerning income tax assessment and re-listed the matter for further proceedings.
Civil application for amendment allowed; matter placed for further hearing on 01.08.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
955wp85592018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
955 WRIT PETITION NO. 8559 OF 2018
WITH CA/9615/2018 IN WP/8559/2018
HARVINDERSINGH BASANTSINGH BINDRA..PETITIONER
VERSUS
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1
AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Raviraj R. Chandak, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr. Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. S. B. Deshpande, ASG for Respondent No.2UOI.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 26th JULY, 2018.
PER COURT:
1.It is submitted by Mr. Sharma, learned
counsel for respondent no.1 that the assessment
order is passed and the petitioner has challenged
the same by filing appeal.
2.Mr. Chandak, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the assessment order is
passed, even without waiting for four weeks period
and all these facts are sought to be brought on
record by way of an amendment.
3.We allow the civil application for
amendment. The petitioner may carry out the
(2) 955wp85592018
amendment.
4.At the request of the petitioner, place
the matter on 01.08.2018.
5. Civil Application is disposed.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/July18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the civil application filed by the petitioner seeking an amendment.
Harvindarsingh Basantsingh Bindra
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1 Aurangabad
Union of India
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court