The court dismissed the writ petition as non-maintainable since the impugned orders are appealable under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, declining to entertain the matter for lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
68 wp 666-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 666OF 2017
Malshida Bhanudas Waghmare & Ors. .. Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
None for the Petitioners. Mr. A.P.Vanarse, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : JULY 30, 2018.
P.C. :
impugned orders are appealable under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to
entertain the petition. Petition is accordingly dismissed.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Digitally signed by Prasanna Prasanna Pradeep Pradeep Salgaonkar Salgaonkar Date:2018.08.01 13:13:57 +0530
1 of 1
salgaonkar
Malshida Bhanudas Waghmare & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhulessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
