The petitioner conceded that their grievance no longer survives following the withdrawal of the pending proceedings by the respondents. The petition was disposed of on this basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 11_wp_2907_2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2907 OF 2017
M/s. Lavasa Corporation Limited …Petitioner Versus Shrikant Panda & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Kaustav Talukdar with Mr. Ruturaj Bankar I/b. M/s. Lex Legal and Partners for the Petitioner.
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent -State.
Mrs. Vrushali Maindad I/b. Mr. Abhijit A. Desai for the Respondent Nos.2 to 6.
Megha Digitally signedby Megha Shridhar Shridhar Parab Date: 2018.07.09 Parab 16:04:43 +0530
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 6th JULY, 2018.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 6, on
instructions makes a statement that the proceedings pending before the Respondent No.1 would be withdrawn within a period of one week from today. Statement is accepted.
Megha
1/2
11_wp_2907_2017.doc
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha
2/2
M/s. Lavasa Corporation Limited
Shrikant Panda & Ors.
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
