Barclays Securities (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Inspector General of Registration and Contrl of Stamps, Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and 3 O

¶1

Megha 33_wp_387_2017.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.387 OF 2017

¶4

Barclays Securities (India) Private Ltd. …Petitioner

¶5

Versus Inspector General of Registration and Controller of Stamps, Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & Ors. ...Respondents

¶6

Mr. Sameer Pandit I/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co. for the Petitioner. Ms Jyoti Chavan, AGP for the Respondent -State.

¶7

CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

¶8

DATED: 6^th JULY, 2018.

¶9

P.C.:-

¶10

In respect of the reliefs claimed in this petition, the Petitioner already filed representation dated 23^rd August, 2016 before Collector of Stamps, Enforcement, Mumbai. This representation is not decided. The learned counsel for the Petitioner having taken instructions, states that petition may be disposed of by directing Collector of Stamps, Enforcement to decide the said representation on its own merits.

¶11

The learned AGP on instructions, states that she has no

¶12

Megha

¶13

1/2

¶14

Megha 33_wp_387_2017.doc

¶15

objection if the petition is disposed of in those terms.

¶16

In the light of above, we deem it convenient to dispose of the petition by directing the Collector of Stamps, Enforcement, Mumbai to decide the Petitioner's representation dated 23^rd August, 2016, copy of which is annexed at Exh.'D' to the Petition, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

¶17

It is made clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter. In order to enable the Collector of Stamps, Enforcement, Mumbai, the Petitioner shall remain present before him alongwith copy of the said representation and copy of this order on 10^th July, 2018.

¶18

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)

¶19

MeghaShridhar Digitally signed byMegha ShridharParab Date: 2018.07.11 Parab 12:01:25 +0530

¶20

Megha

¶21

2/2

Barclays Securities (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Inspector General of Registration and Contrl of Stamps, Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and 3 O

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Barclays Securities (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Inspector General of Registration and Contrl of Stamps, Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and 3 O

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Deccan Minerals Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Krishnamayee Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra Represented by National Investigation Agency Vs Naser Bin Abubaker Yafai (Chaus) @ Naserbin Yafai (Chaus) and Ors.

Rajendra Madhukar Khot Vs Citicorp Finance (India) Ltd.

Malsidha Bhanudas Waghmare and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Ors.

M/S. Lavassa Corporation Limited and Ors. Vs the Micro and Small Enterprises and Ors.