The High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, disposed of the present writ petition by drawing an analogy to a previously disposed petition (WP No.10370/2012) involving the same academic year and referring to it.
The petition was disposed of by reference to a similar case (WP No.10370/2012).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6594 OF 2013
Late Chandrabhan Lomte Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Khed ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS
Shri M.P. Tripathi, Advocate for petitioner Shri P.G. Borade, A.G.P. for State Shri S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shri M.B. Kolpe, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 5th APRIL, 2018.
ORAL ORDER :
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the writ petition on the basis of the similar subject matter and liberty granted in a previous judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.10370/2012Followed¶10
Late Chandrabhan Lomte Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Khed
The State of Maharashtra
Others
Sunil K. Kotwal
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
