The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Contempt Petition Nos. 100 of 2015 and connected W.P. 9343/2013 held that nothing survived in the matter, leaving no further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
938 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2015
IN WP/9343/2013
KHANDERAO DHONDIBA JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Narwade Narayan B.
AGP for Respondents/State : Mrs. D.S. Jape-Ansingkar
...
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 4th APRIL, 2018
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits,
on instructions, that nothing survives in the present
matter. In view of this, Contempt Petition stands
disposed of.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J. ) ( T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
SRM/4/4/18
2
KHANDERAO DHONDIBA JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court