In a contempt petition regarding compliance of a prior writ order, the Court observed that the respondents had complied with the order and the Accountant General also approved it. The petition was disposed of as nothing survived.
Petition disposed of as nothing survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.538 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5713 OF 2003
Narayan s/o Kishanrao Bhise
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri R.R. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner Shri Y.G. Gujarathi, A.G.P. for State
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 5th APRIL, 2018.
ORAL ORDER :
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/
Narayan s/o Kishanrao Bhise
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
