Disposed

Vinayakrao Laxman Hiwale v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC17 Jan 2018WP/617/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in two writ petitions involves petitions against the State and municipal authorities regarding procedures under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The court disposed of the petitions relying on a statement by the respondents' counsel that no further action would occur without a collective hearing, leaving merits open.

What did the court decide?

Both Writ Petitions disposed of; merits left open.

Vinayakrao Laxman Hiwale Vs the State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp617.18

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

 WRIT PETITION NO.617 OF 2018

¶6

Vinayakrao s/o Laxman Hiwale,
Age-52 years, Occu:Business,
R/o-Deolai, Gat No.3,

¶7

Patil Niwas, Tq. & Dist-Aurangabad.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

 VERSUS

¶10

1) The State of Maharashtra,
 Through its Principal Secretary,
 Urban Development Dept.,
 Mantralaya, Mumbai-32,

¶11

2) The Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad,

¶12

 Through its Municipal Commissioner,

¶13

3) District Collector, Aurangabad,

¶14

4) The Executive Engineer,
 World Bank Project,
 Sub Division No.3, Aurangabad,

¶15

5) The Executive Engineer,

¶16

Public Works Department, Aurangabad,

¶17

6) Town Planning Authority, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

 WITH

¶20

wp617.18

¶21

¶22

WRIT PETITION NO.618 OF 2018

¶23

Mohd. Afsar Mohd. Ibrahim,
Age-48 years, Occu:Business,
R/o-Beed By-pass Road,
C.T.S. No.18812, Plot No.2,
Aurangabad, Dist-Aurangabad.
...PETITIONER

¶24

 VERSUS

¶25

1) The State of Maharashtra,
 Through its Principal Secretary,
 Urban Development Dept.,
 Mantralaya, Mumbai-32,

¶26

2) The Municipal Corporation,
 Aurangabad,
 Through its Municipal Commissioner,
3) District Collector, Aurangabad,
4) The Executive Engineer,
 World Bank Project,
 Sub Division No.3, Aurangabad,
5) The Executive Engineer,
 Public Works Department,
 Aurangabad,
6) Town Planning Authority,
 Municipal Corporation,
 Aurangabad.
 ...RESPONDENTS
 ...
 Mr.S.S. Thombre Advocate for Petitioners.
 Mr.S.B. Yawalkar, Additional G.P. and
 Mr. S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent
 Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5.
 Mr. S.S. Tope Advocate for Respondent
 Nos.2 and 6.
 ...

¶27

wp617.18

¶28

¶29

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
 S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

¶30

 DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2018

¶31

ORDER :

¶32

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Petitioners and learned counsel appearing for
Respondent Nos.2 and 6.

¶33

2.Learned counsel appearing for Respondent

¶34

Nos.2 and 6, on instructions, makes a statement

¶35

that unless decision is rendered on the basis of
hearing given to the Petitioners and similarly
situated persons, no further action would be taken
dehors the procedure contemplated under the
provisions of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation
Act.

¶36

3.In view of the statement made by learned
counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.2 and 6, both
the Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶37

wp617.18

¶38

¶39

4.We make it clear that we have not

¶40

considered the merits of the contentions raised in

¶41

the Petitions and the same are left open to be

¶42

agitated at the appropriate time.

¶43

[S.M. GAVHANE, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]

¶44

asb/JAN18

Vinayakrao Laxman Hiwale v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinayakrao Laxman Hiwale v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Shahurao Sanap and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shankuntalabai Subhash Tandhale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gangadhar Ganpatrao Kalyankar Vs the Union of India and Another

Mohd Afsar Mohd Ibrahim Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sampatrao Laxmanrao Surase and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Usha Baliram Masal Vs Hind Seva Mandal through Its Chairman and Others