Petitioners sought permission to withdraw Writ Petition No. 5574 of 2017. The Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition on that ground, keeping contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5574 OF 2017
Eknath Sadashiv Kandpile and Ors.
...Petitioners
V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Satish S. Raut, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. P.P. More, AGP for respondents.
Coram : A.S. Oka, &
Sandeep K. Shinde, JJ.
th Wednesday, 12 December, 2018.
P.C. :
1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner on
instructions seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The
petition is disposed of as withdrawn. All contentions of the
parties are kept open.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
Eknath Sadashiv Kandpile and Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
A.S. Oka
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
