The High Court rejected the civil application that sought expedited hearing and dismissed the underlying writ petition regarding service matters pending since 2002. No hearing date was fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2617 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11310 OF 2012
Kamata Prasad Tiwari ...Applicant
V/s.
Union of India, through Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Prasad Kulkarni I/by. Mr. Kamlesh P. Mali, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Upendra Lokegaonkar and Mr. D.A. Dube, Advocate for the respondents.
Coram : A.S. Oka, &
Sandeep K. Shinde, JJ.
th Wednesday, 12 December, 2018.
P.C. :
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
Kamata Prasad Tiwari
Union of India
A.S. Oka
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
