This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11597 OF 2016
Kundan Ramesh Kamble ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent
Mr. Y.G. Thorat I/by. Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the respondent-State.
Coram : A.S. Oka, &
Sandeep K. Shinde, JJ.
th Wednesday, 12 December, 2018.
P.C. :
1. Time is sought on behalf of the petitioner. We have
perused the prayers made in this petition. In view of the fact that, there was no ad-interim relief granted in favour of
the petitioner, with the passage of time, the prayers made in
the petition, do not survive. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
Kundan Ramesh Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
