Dismissed

Dombivli Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Its Chairman v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Sept 2018WP/5434/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a direction to execute a 30-year lease deed pursuant to a board resolution. The Court held it cannot dictate the lessor's terms and conditions in the lease deed.

What did the court decide?

The petition was rejected as the Court cannot direct the respondent to impose conditions the petitioner finds appropriate in the lease deed.

Dombivli Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Its Chairman Vs… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp 5434.17.doc

¶2

Urmila Ingale

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 5434 OF 2017

¶6

Dombivli Shikshan Prasarak Mandal .. Petitioner Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and ors. .. Respondents

¶7

Mrs.Anjali Purav Yajurvedi a/w Ms.Swati Sharma, for the Petitioner.

¶8

Mr.Prashant Chawan a/w Ms.Chaitrali Khandare I/b Mr.Navdeep Vora Associates, for Respondents No. 1 to 4.

¶9

CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &

¶10

M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 11^th SEPTEMBER, 2018

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

. The petitioner by way of present Petition seeks

¶13

direction to the respondents to execute a lease deed in favour of

¶14

the petitioner for a period of 30 years in pursuance to the resolution of the Board of Directors of respondent No.1 dated 12/08/2011.

¶15

In response to the directions issued by this Court an

¶16

1/3

¶17

wp 5434.17.doc

¶18

affidavit is filed by respondent No.1 stating therein that the said respondent has done whatever possible on its part to get the lease deed executed.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that lease deed which is forwarded by respondent No.1 to the petitioner is not as per the resolution of respondent No.1 dated 12/08/2011. It is stated that various other conditions have been incorporated in the said lease deed and therefore the petitioner was not willing to execute the said lease deed.

¶20

As to what terms and conditions should form the part of the lease deed is for the lessor to determine. The Court while exercising its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot direct the respondent to impose such of the conditions which the petitioner finds it appropriate in the lease deed.

¶21

In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to

¶22

2/3

¶23

wp 5434.17.doc

¶24

entertain the present Petition while exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petition therefore rejected.

¶25

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.)

¶26

3/3

Dombivli Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Its Chairman v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dombivli Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Its Chairman v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sainath Shivajidurge Vs University of Mumbai through Its Registrar and 2 Ors.

Saeeda Kasim Kham and Anr. Vs Housing Developement and Infrastructure Private Limited and 6 Ors.

Suchitra Chavan Vs Axis Bank Asset Sales Centre

Shri. Devidas Dhanaji Thakre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Smt. Vidya Shital Kudache Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Gajanan Bharat Teke and Anr. Vs Shivnagar Vidya Prasarak Mandal and Ors.