In this writ petition, the petitioners informed the Court via their counsel that they did not wish to proceed with the present petition. Consequently, the Writ Petition was disposed of without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10006 OF 2014
Shri Gajanan Bharat Teke and anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Shivnagar Vidya Prasarak Mandal and ors. .. Respondents
Ms.Kumud Bhatia I/b Mr.Vishnu A. Madane, for the Petitioners. Mr.Ajinkya Udane I/b Mr.S.B.Deshmukh, for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B. Kalel, AGP for State – Respondents No. 4, 5 & 8. Ms.S.N.Khan I/b Mr.R.V.Govilkar, for Respondent No. 7.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2018
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 has placed
on record communication addressed by the petitioners to it
stating therein that the petitioners do not wish to prosecute the
present Petition. Copy of the said letter is taken on record.
Writ Petition is disposed of.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1/1
Shri Gajanan Bharat Teke
Shivnagar Vidya Prasarak Mandal
B.R.GAVAI
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
