This is a short order in a writ petition where neither the petitioner nor the respondent appeared. The Court found that the respondent had expired long back. The petition was disposed of as abated.
Petition disposed of as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp 4733.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITON NO. 4733 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nashik .. Petitioner
Versus
Ramrao Sitaram Patil .. Respondent
Shri. D. V. Soman, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. A. D. Pawar, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : 27th August, 2018
PER COURT:
was made by Mr. Alok Sharma, the learned counsel that he is no longer in
a position to appear in the present petition. At his request the matter was
adjourned. Today also none appears for the petitioner.
submits that the respondent has also expired long back.
costs.
[ S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
ass/wp 4733.12
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nashik
Ramrao Sitaram Patil
S.V. Gangapurwala
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
