The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by Petitioner No. 1 regarding a caste claim. Liberty was granted to Petitioner No. 2 to independently challenge the impugned order. The associated civil application was also disposed of.
Liberty granted to Petitioner No. 2 to contest the caste claim order independently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp 3766.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITON NO. 3766 OF 2012 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4144 OF 2016
Shaikh Hameed Shaikh Hyder and another
.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Shri. A. S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri. V. S. Badakh, A.G.P. for Respondent/State. Shri. V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : 27th August, 2018
PER COURT:
. Mr. Golegaonkar, the learned counsel, on instructions, states that
the Petitioner No. 1 is not interested in prosecuting the present writ
petition as he is retired. Liberty may be given to the Petitioner No. 2 to
independently challenge the order invalidating the caste claim.
( 2 ) wp 3766.12
the present writ petition, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
to the extent of Petitioner No. 1. Liberty to Petitioner No. 2 to assail the order as may be permissible in law. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
disposed of.
[ S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
ass/wp 3766.12
Shaikh Hameed Shaikh Hyder and another
The State of Maharashtra and others
S.V. Gangapurwala
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
