The court disposed of the writ petition where the impugned communication was voluntarily withdrawn by the respondents. The petitioner's application for development permission was directed to be decided within six weeks without insisting on gazette notification.
[ii] Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
450.18-wp
1
skn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 450 OF 2018
Bhaskar Sudhakar Shetty. … Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra and others. … Respondents.
Mr.I.M.Khairdi for the petitioner. Mr.Manish M. Pabale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.A.S.Rao for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND P.N.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 16th January 2018.
P.C.:
Not on board. Taken on board.
450.18-wp
2
skn
decided by the Municipal Corporation as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within a period of six weeks from today in the light of order dated 7th April 2015 passed in Writ Petition No.8005/2012 without insisting upon publication of gazette notification under sub-section (2) of section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
(iii) All concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of this order.
(P.N.DESHMUKH, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhaskar Sudhakar Shetty
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
